1.Leadership as an ability to handle another person to
obtain maximum results with minimum friction
and greater cooperation,
leadership is a strength of spirit / morale of creative and focused. Leaders work with
other people: A leader is responsible for working with others,
one with his superiors, staff, coworkers or other
superiors in the organization as
well as people outside the
organization
2. task leader In every community there
is always a leader. The role of
diverse leaders, among them are as mover, motivator,
inspiration, direction, uniting, patron, protector,
helper, compassion divider, adequate and
welfare, and so
on. A leader's job, so there are many and severe. All of that role will
be accounted for, either in the presence of humans they lead and in the
presence of the Lord one day.
3. I think it is a leadership style where
the style or the way a person in performing duties, authority and responsibility in
a job by job and fit in their respective professions.
style of leadership that I know are as follows:
*Bureaucratic -
This is one style that is characterized by a continuous attachment to the
organization's rules. This
style is considered that the difficulties would be overcome if everyone follow
the rules. The
decisions made based on standard procedures. Its
leader was a diplomat and knows how to use most of the rules to make people do
their job. Compromise
is a way of life due to make a decision accepted by the majority, people often
had to yield to others.
*Permissive - Here the intention is to make every person in the group are satisfied. Making people happy is still the rule. This style assumes that if people feel satisfied with themselves and others, then the organization will function and thus, the work will be completed. Coordination is often sacrificed in this style.
*Laissez-faire - This is absolutely not leadership. This style is to let things run their course. Leaders only perform maintenance functions only. For example, a priest may name only the chairman of the organization and only handle the affairs of the sermon, while others do all the trinkets of how the organization should operate. This style is sometimes used by the leaders who frequently travel or temporary duty only.
*Participatory - This style is worn by those who believe that the way to motivate people is by involving them in decision-making process. It is expected to create a sense of shared goals and objectives. The problem that arises is the possibility of slow action in dealing with periods of crisis.
*Autocratic - This style is characterized by dependence to the authorities and usually assume that people will not do anything unless instructed. This style does not encourage any updates. Leaders consider themselves indispensable. Decisions can be made quickly.
4.if I am going to be
a leader in a
company, I will be a responsible leader, has a concept for memajhukan
company, firm, wise, fair, and take my staff is a friend who
can be invited to
succeed the ultimate goal of the company.
and if later on there
will be a problem I will be responsible, completed in accordance with the
right concept to solve the problem*Permissive - Here the intention is to make every person in the group are satisfied. Making people happy is still the rule. This style assumes that if people feel satisfied with themselves and others, then the organization will function and thus, the work will be completed. Coordination is often sacrificed in this style.
*Laissez-faire - This is absolutely not leadership. This style is to let things run their course. Leaders only perform maintenance functions only. For example, a priest may name only the chairman of the organization and only handle the affairs of the sermon, while others do all the trinkets of how the organization should operate. This style is sometimes used by the leaders who frequently travel or temporary duty only.
*Participatory - This style is worn by those who believe that the way to motivate people is by involving them in decision-making process. It is expected to create a sense of shared goals and objectives. The problem that arises is the possibility of slow action in dealing with periods of crisis.
*Autocratic - This style is characterized by dependence to the authorities and usually assume that people will not do anything unless instructed. This style does not encourage any updates. Leaders consider themselves indispensable. Decisions can be made quickly.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar